Autocene

“Liked the easy implementation, good training, and low cost of ownership. Found the dependence on Microsoft InfoPath a concern because of its limited support.”

“Liked how customizable it was for a large state system. Found that it requires significant effort from users to define their needs up front.”

“Liked that it is easy for users, responsive, and good value. Found some response time issues during the first year, which were later resolved.”

“Liked the no-code platform, easy form configuration, and useful dashboards. Found the reliance on end-of-life InfoPath a drawback while a replacement was underway.”

“Liked the timely and responsive handling of their requests. Noted no major drawbacks beyond wishing they had started using it sooner.”

“Liked how quickly efficient workflows could be built and how easy the tool was to learn. Noted no major drawbacks.”

“Liked the easy no-code setup, feature-rich form builder, and strong support. Noted no major drawbacks during their early prototype work.”

“Liked the fast implementation and the excellent support they received from the team. Noted no major drawbacks with the product.”

“Liked that no coding was needed and that forms could be customized. Found that defining the process and data requirements took the longest time.”

“Liked how it automated documents and reduced the amount of paper involved in their day-to-day business processes. Noted no major drawbacks.”

“Liked the attentive developers, process customization, and easy integration with other systems. Found that the workflow features took some time to learn.”

“Liked how it eased their move from paper to an electronic process. Found they wanted an easier built-in function for exporting data.”

“Liked that firms could submit information and applications electronically. Found occasional glitches, though these were resolved quickly by the team.”

“Liked that the tool is intuitive and logical to use. Found a slow learning curve and occasional slow processing times.”

“Liked the transparency, accessibility, and excellent service the team provided throughout the project. Found the early interface clunky, though it has since improved.”

“Liked the flexibility, efficiency, and strong rules-based automation it brought to their business processes and approvals. Noted no major drawbacks.”