Ocrolus

“Liked how easy and efficient it is, speeding up underwriting and keeping reviews consistent. Found reporting could improve, error investigations slow, and the suspicious activity flag review lacking transparency.”

“Liked the easy-to-use API and toolset with accurate extraction and calculations. Found the API does not allow multiple webhooks on a single call, creating inefficiencies in end-user communication.”

“Liked that the software is fast and easy to work with for processing documents. Found the dashboard less user-friendly than desired for day-to-day use.”

“Liked how it automates bank statement deposit analysis that used to require a lot of manual time. Noted no major drawbacks with the product during use.”

“Liked how quickly and accurately it handles financial documents. Found turnaround occasionally long and noted that Excel files cannot be downloaded from the platform.”

“Liked that it is central to the underwriting process and extracts data in a usable format. Found processing speed could be better, though it has been steadily improving.”

“Liked that it makes the job easier when it catches all lenders on a statement. Found it very slow during busy periods, sometimes taking over an hour, so staff skip it.”

“Liked the useful analysis that speeds up the process and catches details that might be missed. Found it runs slowly on busy days, sometimes finishing after manual work was complete.”

“Liked the few steps needed to submit data, output within hours, and accurate reports. Noted no major drawbacks with the service during use.”

“Liked how easy it is to create new books and upload documents for analysis. Found it would benefit from tighter integration with other business software.”

“Liked how efficient it is once the features are learned through some exploration. Found some processes are delayed and take longer than they reasonably should.”

“Liked how very easy the interface is to use for everyday document work. Noted no major drawbacks with the product during use.”