Thunderbit

“Liked how easy it is to get clean tables quickly from web pages. Found it somewhat expensive and wanted a one-click way to replicate an existing task.”

“Liked that it takes only a few clicks to turn a page into exportable data. Found no one-click option to export combined results from multiple pages.”

“Liked that the AI suggests what to extract and builds the structure, with JSON or Excel output. Found the free version limited, which seemed understandable given AI costs.”

“Liked the easy onboarding, intuitive interface, and broad integrations with Slack, Google Workspace, and CRMs. Found the mobile app limited and advanced features carry a steep learning curve.”

“Liked the reusable scraper setups for recurring SEO checks. Found that fields may need reconfiguring whenever a target site changes its page layout.”

“Liked the clear view of what is being scraped and the helpful column suggestions. Found that subpage analysis is not available on the free plan.”

“Liked that it is easy to start, offers useful templates, and works as a Chrome extension. Found pricing high for occasional users who scrape only now and then.”

“Liked the user-friendly design, time savings, and AI-driven workflows. Found that advanced use cases take time to learn and wanted more customization options.”

“Liked how quickly it handled a complex site structure and captured key fields. Found it costly and that it scraped unneeded rows, which wasted credits.”

“Liked how it structures pages into tables, plus scheduled tasks and auto-scroll. Found credit limits restrictive and header mapping failed to update between runs, causing a large bad export.”

“Liked the reliable competitor price tracking and responsive support. Found a steep learning curve for advanced automation and higher tiers priced on the expensive side.”

“Liked that no setup is needed and it saves time finding contacts. Found it expensive at volume, sometimes missing contacts, and slow on large sets of pages.”

“Liked that it is easy to use and field selection is painless. Found results occasionally inaccurate and slow, and support was unresponsive when contacted.”

“Liked the simple interface, the AI field chooser, and the clean CSV output that is ready for immediate use. Noted no major drawbacks.”

“Liked that it is easy to use and exports to Excel and CSV. Found that more guidance is needed on advanced features and on getting support.”