Zenrows

“Liked the support for many programming languages and how easy it was to integrate into code. Found the scraping quality fell short of expectations.”

“Liked that it works reliably and was the fastest scraping solution the reviewer tested. Found the structure of the pricing tiers a drawback.”

“Liked the fast, high-performing API that finally solved scraping issues the team had struggled with for a long time. Found it occasionally struggles with complex, JavaScript-heavy websites.”

“Liked how simple the code implementation was to get working. Found the analytics hard to read, the billing breakdown unclear, and proxy insights weak.”

“Liked how easy it is and that harder websites still work. Found the subscription too expensive at low usage and the builder sometimes freezes.”

“Liked the clean interface, ease of use, Clay integration, and affordability. Found the lowest plan at $70 a month too high without a hobby tier.”

“Liked the remote browser endpoint that keeps its stealth configuration up to date. Found scaling expensive and cheaper shared datacenter IPs unavailable.”

“Liked that it is easy to use and that billing support was fast. Found it expensive enough to limit regular use.”

“Liked the large feature set, easy start, and automatic retries. Found it more complex, pricier, harder to navigate, and felt the base experience has declined.”

“Liked the done-for-you service that runs in the background and is easy to use. Found pricing may get costly for heavy operations.”

“Liked that it works smoothly with Clay and returns results quickly at a low cost compared with other options. Noted no major drawbacks.”

“Liked the simple API and thorough documentation, which together saved a lot of time. Found some site-specific nuances tricky, though the docs helped.”

“Liked clean data output, a real-time request view, and helpful support. Found the documentation could improve and dead links triggered costlier tiers.”

“Liked how easily it scrapes protected sites. Found success is around 99 percent rather than complete and best results need programming skill.”

“Liked that it is powerful yet approachable for non-coders and quick to learn. Found few quick-start resources or video tutorials.”

“Liked the fair price, easy learning, and Google scraping feature. Found the Clay integration sometimes needs several runs to fetch all data.”